Home  Non-duality Interviews Bio Essays  Work   Pig magazine  Video   Heyoka Magazine ARTList

INTERVIEW WITH ROSA NAPARSTEK

for artists interview artists

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Rosa Naparstek: When did you first call yourself an artist/or refer to yourself as an artist?

JL: When I first started showing my work around the galleries in NY, during the early 80s... 81 and onward.

Rosa Naparstek: Do you usually begin work with an idea of what you want to do, or does the idea emerge in the process of working?

JL: Yes, and then allow the process to take effect. The important thing to me about the creative process is patience. Giving each peace as much breathing space and time it needs. Not working too hard or being pushy or concerned with validation, approval, outcome. The process is much more important. Also listening to my mental radio, being mindful of how ones mind can create rules and regulations and then breaking these rules. Not allowing this societal, educational, philosophical and commercial conditioning to get in the way.

Rosa Naparstek: Do you think that "progress" exists in the arts? And if so, what does it mean? How is it achieved?

 

Water course way
Photograph
1995


Qi
Ink on paper
2000

 

JL: Yes I do. I think there is tremendous room for improvement and it is all the time. I believe the art and music world is by far the greatest place to be in or involved in right now, in terms of artistic license and freedom. What progress means to me personally is awareness. About myself first and others. Becoming more aware and doing something with it.

Rosa Naparstek: Do you make a distinction between political art and ideological art?

JL: No. Most art in this nuclear day and age is political and ideological. I think art should can be used as a vehicle for addressing political and ideological concerns. Like Picasso's Guernica or Goyas Disasters of war for example. Post modernism was about blurring of these distinctions. I personally believe post modernism is over and never understood the hype about it. In all honesty I always thought it was a just another sales pitch. I think there is something else much richer and deeper, more meaningful going on. It's not so ideological like new age hippies in the sixties. Not that sort of thing. I think this war in Iraq has also helped jump start this. Especially for artists who devote their lives to being creative having to see and stomach politicians doing the opposite. War is the antitheses of creativity isn't it.

 Rosa Naparstek: Do artists have a social responsibility?

JL: Every human being has a social responsibility. No escape in being an artist. Artist's even more of a responsibly because of the platform, power and influence they have. That does not mean they have to address it in their work, but can use their creativity in so many ways.


 

 

Back to Top   Copyright © 2008 John LeKay